Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video401 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Sales results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Framing Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 86 hits. Analysis detected 783 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,604 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (10,307 of 16,510 topics). This Military Sales is better (less manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group.
Military Sales
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,604
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510037.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.2%5.2%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos