Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Military Reporting results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 1,201 hits . Analysis detected 6,071 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,297 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 15,966 topics). This Military Reporting is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Military Reporting
Topic details
Total words: 6,297
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.7% 10.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst