Topic summary
⁠32%2 analyzed articles/videos1,654 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Readiness results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 868 hits. Analysis detected 6,706 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,114 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (13,175 of 16,562 topics). This Military Readiness is better (less manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group.
Military Readiness
Topic details
Total words: 8,114
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510020.5% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.7%10.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos