Topic summary
⁠70%3 analyzed articles/videos1,519 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Funding results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 1,606 hits. Analysis detected 9,908 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,685 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,792 of 16,562 topics). This Military Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group.
Military Funding
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,685
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510071.1% percentile
4.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.0%24.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 20.2%20.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos