Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video136 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Draft results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Status Quo Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 149 faulty-reasoning hits from 544 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,441 of 16,559 topics). This Military Draft is worse (more manipulative) than 85.30% of the peer group.
Military Draft
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠86%Military Draft (selected)7%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 544
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510085.3% percentile
6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles544 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 16.2%16.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 11.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos