Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video753 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Attacks results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 477 hits. Analysis detected 2,392 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,012 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,184 of 16,562 topics). This Military Attacks is worse (more manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group.
Military Attacks
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,012
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510056.6% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.9%6.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.8%15.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos