Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,517 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Vrabel results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 1,579 hits. Analysis detected 6,422 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,068 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (8,296 of 15,765 topics). This Mike Vrabel is better (less manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Mike Vrabel
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,068
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510047.4% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 26.0%26.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.1%11.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 26.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Recency Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.9%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos