Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Mike Pence results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Bandwagon, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 285 hits. Analysis detected 1,487 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,200 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,564 topics). This Mike Pence is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Mike Pence
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Mike Pence (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 2,200
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.9%12.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Bandwagon: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos