Topic summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video526 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Lindell results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 194 hits. Analysis detected 1,643 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (10,169 of 22,956 topics). This Mike Lindell is worse (more manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group.
Mike Lindell
Topic details
Total words: 2,104
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.7% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos