Topic summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video1,691 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Migrant Crossings results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 986 hits. Analysis detected 7,052 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,284 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (13,778 of 16,562 topics). This Migrant Crossings is better (less manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group.
Migrant Crossings
Topic details
Total words: 10,284
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510016.8% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos