Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,837 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Migrant Crisis results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 33.2% saturation with 1,829 hits. Analysis detected 10,107 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,511 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (3,498 of 16,562 topics). This Migrant Crisis is worse (more manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group.
Migrant Crisis
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠79%Migrant Crisis (selected)6%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 5,511
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510078.9% percentile
5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 21.0%21.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 27.3%27.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 33.2%33.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.7%8.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Topic 3.5%3.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 33.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 27.3%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 21.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.7%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Horn Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.0%Special Pleading: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos