Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video776 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Middle East (western Asia) results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 586 hits. Analysis detected 1,423 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,624 of 16,562 topics). This Middle East (western Asia) is worse (more manipulative) than 84.20% of the peer group.
Middle East (western Asia)
Topic details
Total words: 3,104
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510084.2% percentile
6.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 18.9%18.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 2.8%2.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 17.0%17.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Halo Effect: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos