Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,273 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Middle East Crisis Live results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 706 hits . Analysis detected 5,360 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,819 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 26% (12,335 of 16,562 topics). This Middle East Crisis Live is better (less manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group. Middle East Crisis Live
Topic details
Total words: 6,819
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst