Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 876 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Middle Age results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34.7% saturation with 1,215 hits . Analysis detected 7,328 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,504 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 80% (3,417 of 16,562 topics). This Middle Age is worse (more manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group. Middle Age
Topic details
Total words: 3,504
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.4% percentile 5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 34.7% 34.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 27.4% 27.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 12.6% 12.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 13.4% 13.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 34.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 27.4%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Horn Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst