Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 876 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emma Brockes results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34.7% saturation with 1,215 hits . Analysis detected 7,328 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,504 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 86% (921 of 6,213 authors). This Emma Brockes is worse (more manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group. Emma Brockes
Author details
Total words: 3,504
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.2% percentile 5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 34.7% 34.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 27.4% 27.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 12.6% 12.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 13.4% 13.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 34.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 27.4%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 23.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 12.6%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 10.3%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Horn Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst