Topic summary
⁠41%2 analyzed articles/videos756 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Microbiome results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Overconfidence Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 648 hits. Analysis detected 5,586 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,396 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (10,414 of 16,562 topics). This Microbiome is better (less manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group.
Microbiome
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,396
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510037.1% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.1%10.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.4%5.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.1%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos