Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,756 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michigan Wolverines results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 1,076 hits. Analysis detected 8,862 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,309 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,306 of 16,559 topics). This Michigan Wolverines is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Michigan Wolverines
Topic details
Total words: 6,309
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.9% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.1%17.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.3%13.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.7%9.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.0%12.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 9.8%9.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos