Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,951 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michelle Obama results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 1,863 hits. Analysis detected 11,611 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,364 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (4,988 of 16,562 topics). This Michelle Obama is worse (more manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group.
Michelle Obama
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,364
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.9% percentile
4.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 29.3%29.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.2%11.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 29.2%29.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.0%5.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 29.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 29.2%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos