Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video732 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Wolff results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.6% saturation with 751 hits. Analysis detected 4,502 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,928 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,733 of 16,562 topics). This Michael Wolff is worse (more manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group.
Michael Wolff
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,928
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510071.4% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.3%14.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.1%17.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.4%7.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 25.6%25.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 25.6%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 0.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos