Topic summary
⁠78%2 analyzed articles/videos1,240 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miami Dade County results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 913 hits. Analysis detected 5,975 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,862 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (5,542 of 16,562 topics). This Miami Dade County is worse (more manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.
Miami Dade County
Topic details
Total words: 4,862
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510066.5% percentile
4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.8%18.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.4%18.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.1%15.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.3%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos