Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,154 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mexico National Football Team results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 495 hits. Analysis detected 3,736 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,616 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,929 of 16,562 topics). This Mexico National Football Team is better (less manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group.
Mexico National Football Team
Topic details
Total words: 4,616
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510040.1% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.7%10.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos