Topic summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video1,827 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mexico City Culture results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Self-Serving Bias, and Anecdotal, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 368 hits. Analysis detected 4,469 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,481 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (11,491 of 16,562 topics). This Mexico City Culture is better (less manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group.
Mexico City Culture
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠31%Mexico City Culture (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 5,481
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510030.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos