Topic summary
⁠9%1 analyzed article/video589 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meta Platforms results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Indoctrination, and Anecdotal, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 192 hits. Analysis detected 1,492 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,356 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (11,594 of 16,562 topics). This Meta Platforms is better (less manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group.
Meta Platforms
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,356
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.0% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 8.2%8.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.2%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos