Author summary
21%3 analyzed articles/videos1,700 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Khamosh Pathak results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 988 hits. Analysis detected 7,169 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,888 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 25% (4,971 of 6,628 authors). This Khamosh Pathak is better (less manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group.
Khamosh Pathak
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
25%Khamosh Pathak (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,888
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

25% percentile
025507510025.0% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.0%10.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.3%3.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.0%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate