Author summary
21% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,700 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Khamosh Pathak results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 988 hits . Analysis detected 7,169 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,888 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 25% (4,971 of 6,628 authors). This Khamosh Pathak is better (less manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group. Khamosh Pathak
Author details
Total words: 9,888
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.0% 10.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.0%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst