Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,404 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Messaging Apps results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Framing Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 427 hits. Analysis detected 4,111 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,616 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,700 of 16,558 topics). This Messaging Apps is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Messaging Apps
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,616
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.4% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.4%7.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.6%7.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.6%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 0.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos