Topic summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video634 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meritocracy Vs Privilege results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.2% saturation with 843 hits. Analysis detected 4,120 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,536 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (4,094 of 16,562 topics). This Meritocracy Vs Privilege is worse (more manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group.
Meritocracy Vs Privilege
Topic details
Total words: 2,536
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510075.3% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 33.2%33.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.6%11.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.6%9.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.8%5.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 33.2%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 8.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos