Author summary
84% 2 analyzed articles/videos 634 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greg Maresca results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 27.3% saturation with 1,365 hits . Analysis detected 7,626 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,004 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,025 of 6,536 authors). This Greg Maresca is worse (more manipulative) than 69.00% of the peer group. Greg Maresca
Author details
Total words: 5,004
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.0% percentile 3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 27.3% 27.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 21.3% 21.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.8% 12.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Hasty Generalization: Author 27.3%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst