Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Mental Health Impact Of AI results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 454 hits. Analysis detected 2,922 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,103 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Mental Health Impact Of AI is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Mental Health Impact Of AI
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Mental Health Impact Of AI (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 2,103
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 21.6%21.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 9.8%9.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.6%11.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.9%5.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.4%12.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.6%12.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.6%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos