Topic summary
⁠42%2 analyzed articles/videos1,042 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Men's Soccer results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 1,127 hits. Analysis detected 6,630 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,948 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (14,423 of 16,562 topics). This Men's Soccer is better (less manipulative) than 87.10% of the peer group.
Men's Soccer
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 10,948
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

13% percentile
025507510012.9% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.3%10.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos