Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Men's And Boys' Health results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 327 hits. Analysis detected 2,985 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,531 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Men's And Boys' Health is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Men's And Boys' Health
Topic details
Total words: 3,531
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.8%3.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos