Topic summary
⁠16%3 analyzed articles/videos3,079 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Memory results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 1,100 hits. Analysis detected 11,804 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,395 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (15,245 of 16,494 topics). This Memory is better (less manipulative) than 92.40% of the peer group.
Memory
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 18,395
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

8% percentile
02550751007.6% percentile
1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles18.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos