Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video849 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Megyn Kelly Sydney Sweeney Euphoria Baby Scene results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 715 hits. Analysis detected 4,445 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,396 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,200 of 15,149 topics). This Megyn Kelly Sydney Sweeney Euphoria Baby Scene is worse (more manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group.
Megyn Kelly Sydney Sweeney Euphoria Baby Scene
Topic details
Total words: 3,396
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510065.7% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 12.8%12.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.1%12.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Personal Incredulity: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Horn Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos