Topic summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,549 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Megyn Kelly results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, In-Group Bias, and Straw Man, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 1,123 hits. Analysis detected 10,442 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,321 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 55% (6,984 of 15,447 topics). This Megyn Kelly is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Megyn Kelly
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,321
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.8% percentile
3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 15.3%15.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.9%12.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.8%8.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.9%Straw Man: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 0.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate