Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video402 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medicare Reforms results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 66.4% saturation with 794 hits. Analysis detected 2,463 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,195 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (752 of 16,562 topics). This Medicare Reforms is worse (more manipulative) than 95.50% of the peer group.
Medicare Reforms
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,195
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

96% percentile
025507510095.5% percentile
12.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 50.5%50.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 66.4%66.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 17.0%17.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 19.1%19.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.2%13.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 66.4%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 50.5%, sitewide 4.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos