Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video508 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medical Waste Disposal results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 40.2% saturation with 612 hits. Analysis detected 2,934 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,524 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (1,395 of 16,562 topics). This Medical Waste Disposal is worse (more manipulative) than 91.60% of the peer group.
Medical Waste Disposal
Topic details
Total words: 1,524
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

92% percentile
025507510091.6% percentile
9.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 40.2%40.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 27.9%27.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 19.9%19.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.3%17.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 9.7%9.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 7.7%7.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 40.2%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 27.9%, sitewide 9.1%Framing Effect: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 3.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.5%Anecdotal: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos