Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video779 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medical Science results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 465 hits. Analysis detected 2,501 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,893 of 16,562 topics). This Medical Science is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Medical Science
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠53%Medical Science (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,116
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510052.3% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.9%14.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos