Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,282 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medical Misconduct results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 36.2% saturation with 1,391 hits. Analysis detected 5,544 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,846 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 76% (4,036 of 16,562 topics). This Medical Misconduct is worse (more manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Medical Misconduct
Topic details
Total words: 3,846
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510075.6% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 36.2%36.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 17.5%17.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 5.9%5.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 36.2%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Bandwagon: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos