Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,282 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medical Misconduct results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 36.2% saturation with 1,391 hits . Analysis detected 5,544 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,846 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 76% (4,036 of 16,562 topics). This Medical Misconduct is worse (more manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group. Medical Misconduct
Topic details
Total words: 3,846
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.6% percentile 5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 36.2% 36.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 17.5% 17.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 36.2%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Bandwagon: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst