Topic summary
⁠96%2 analyzed articles/videos1,663 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medical Ethics results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.9% saturation with 1,502 hits. Analysis detected 11,014 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,376 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,088 of 15,327 topics). This Medical Ethics is worse (more manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group.
Medical Ethics
Topic details
Total words: 5,376
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510073.3% percentile
4.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 27.9%27.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.0%12.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 15.9%15.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 20.9%20.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 27.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Straw Man: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos