Topic summary
83% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,904 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Media Manipulation results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 2,514 hits . Analysis detected 17,284 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,616 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 50% (10,624 of 21,038 topics). This Media Manipulation is better (less manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group. Media Manipulation
Topic details
Total words: 15,616
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.5% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles15.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 16.1% 16.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 15.3% 15.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 15.3% 15.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.4% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst