Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 499 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Media Feuds results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ad Hominem , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 46.3% saturation with 693 hits . Analysis detected 5,027 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,497 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.6% and a BS Rank of 92% (1,414 of 16,562 topics). This Media Feuds is worse (more manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group. Media Feuds
Topic details
Total words: 1,497
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.5% percentile 9.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 24.1% 24.1% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Topic 21.2% 21.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 46.3% 46.3% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Topic 18.4% 18.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 21.6% 21.6% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Topic 16.4% 16.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 30.0% 30.0% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Personal Incredulity Sitewide 0.2% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 46.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 30.0%, sitewide 19.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 24.1%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 7.5% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.6%, sitewide 15.9% Horn Effect: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 1.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 3.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 6.9% Red Herring: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 0.7% Personal Incredulity: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 0.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.2%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 3.7% Burden of Proof: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.4% Tu Quoque: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst