Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video409 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Media Commentary results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 213 hits. Analysis detected 1,344 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,636 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,170 of 16,275 topics). This Media Commentary is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Media Commentary
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,636
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.9% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 9.6%9.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.0%13.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.2%6.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 19.2%Recency Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Middle Ground: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos