Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,779 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Media Censorship results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 1,502 hits . Analysis detected 13,714 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 53% (7,897 of 16,558 topics). This Media Censorship is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group. Media Censorship
Topic details
Total words: 11,116
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.3% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 5.8% 5.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Slippery Slope: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.7%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst