Topic summary
70% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,178 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Media Analysis results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hindsight Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 7,794 hits . Analysis detected 56,611 faulty-reasoning hits from 47,112 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (10,900 of 15,783 topics). This Media Analysis is better (less manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group. Media Analysis
Topic details
Total words: 47,112
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles47.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 16.5% 16.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst