Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video550 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mayoral Politics results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, In-Group Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 137 hits. Analysis detected 1,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,650 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (9,496 of 16,558 topics). This Mayoral Politics is better (less manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group.
Mayoral Politics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,650
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.7% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.1%4.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos