Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,558 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mayor Zohran Mamdani results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 39.1% saturation with 1,827 hits . Analysis detected 8,026 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,674 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 78% (3,769 of 16,562 topics). This Mayor Zohran Mamdani is worse (more manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group. Mayor Zohran Mamdani
Topic details
Total words: 4,674
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.2% percentile 5.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 39.1% 39.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 14.9% 14.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 31.5% 31.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 39.1%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 31.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst