Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,087 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mayo Clinic results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 31.5% saturation with 1,027 hits. Analysis detected 6,293 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,261 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (2,833 of 16,562 topics). This Mayo Clinic is worse (more manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group.
Mayo Clinic
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,261
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510082.9% percentile
6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 13.9%13.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 11.0%11.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 19.4%19.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 31.5%31.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 23.1%23.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 4.1%4.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 31.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Red Herring: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos