Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,087 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Molly Castle Work results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 31.5% saturation with 1,027 hits . Analysis detected 6,293 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,261 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 89% (782 of 6,628 authors). This Molly Castle Work is worse (more manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group. Molly Castle Work
Author details
Total words: 3,261
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.2% percentile 6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 13.9% 13.9% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 19.4% 19.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 31.5% 31.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.1% 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 23.1% 23.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Author 3.8% 3.8% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Author 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 31.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 23.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 19.4%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 18.5%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 13.9%, sitewide 5.2% Loss Aversion: Author 11.0%, sitewide 2.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 9.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Red Herring: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Genetic Fallacy: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Composition/Division: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst