Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video664 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Gaetz results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 571 hits. Analysis detected 5,502 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,656 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (3,061 of 16,312 topics). This Matt Gaetz is worse (more manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group.
Matt Gaetz
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,656
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510081.2% percentile
5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 21.5%21.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 15.6%15.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 15.4%15.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 8.6%8.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 20.2%20.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 9.1%9.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.6%7.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 3.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos