Topic summary
50% 2 analyzed articles/videos 633 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Math Scores results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 901 hits . Analysis detected 3,085 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,589 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 1% (16,458 of 16,562 topics). This Math Scores is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group. Math Scores
Topic details
Total words: 10,589
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.6% percentile 0.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1% Horn Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst