Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Matcha Lattes results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 471 hits. Analysis detected 3,373 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,340 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,269 topics). This Matcha Lattes is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Matcha Lattes
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,340
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 10.8%10.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.6%6.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos